Experiments in Art & Technology
E.A.T.
An organization that brokered marriages between artists and Bell Labs engineers to make art from new technology.
- Era
- 1966 – 1980
- Place
- New York
- Morphology
- Network
- Founders
- Klüver · Waldhauer · Rauschenberg · Whitman
Abstract / REC.001
An afterthought to one event that ended as an infrastructure.
E.A.T. began as an afterthought to a single event and ended as an infrastructure. “9 Evenings: Theatre and Engineering” (Oct 1966) paired ten New York artists — Rauschenberg, Whitman, Cage, Rainer, Childs, Tudor, Hay among them — with some thirty to forty Bell Telephone Laboratories engineers to build performances instrumented with wireless FM control, closed-circuit video, and improvised switching circuits; Rauschenberg’s “Open Score” turned a wired tennis match into a lighting-and-sound trigger.
Klüver, Waldhauer, Rauschenberg, and Whitman then formalized that one-off pairing as a standing nonprofit, its Technical Services program matching any artist who wrote in with an engineer willing to volunteer — run from a loft at 9 East 16th Street and reported through a mimeographed newsletter. Its apex and its crisis were the same object: the Pepsi Pavilion at Expo ’70 in Osaka, a mirrored dome wrapped in Fujiko Nakaya’s fog sculpture, whose experimental ambitions collided with Pepsi-Cola’s expectations of a conventional corporate showcase.
The Matching Service / SWITCHBOARD
An organization built to manufacture collisions.
The core mechanism was a brokerage: an artist wrote in, an engineer volunteered, and Technical Services patched them together. Draw it and it becomes a switching matrix — the studio jacked into the laboratory, one channel at a time.
Unifying Principle / THESIS
The premise the whole apparatus ran on
Artists and engineers working as equals can produce new art and more humane technology; the organization’s job is to broker and support those collaborations at scale.
Motifs & Forces / ANALYSIS
What the field was made of, and what drove it.
MotifsCH.01
- The artist–engineer collaboration
- Art made from, and about, new technology
- The spectacular technical performance (9 Evenings)
- The corporation and the studio brought together
Memetic forcesCH.02
- The utopian belief that pairing artists with engineers could humanize technology and enlarge art drew idealists on both sides
- Access to Bell Labs’ talent and equipment was a unique, exciting resource
- The ambition to scale — thousands of members, a matching service — gave it movement energy
Convergent enginesCH.03 · +
- Klüver and Rauschenberg’s founding partnership
- The artist–engineer matching service and membership
- Landmark collaborative events — 9 Evenings, the Pepsi Pavilion
Divergent enginesCH.04 · −
- The difficulty of sustaining art–corporate collaborations
- Technical failures and funding strain
- The diffusion of its model into universities and media labs
Internal Dynamics / WIRING
A brokerage running on goodwill it could not always secure.
A nonprofit brokerage pairing artists with engineers, driven by a few charismatic founders and dependent on corporate and technical goodwill it could not always secure. The circuit only closed when a corporation lent its lab and an engineer lent his evenings — a power supply E.A.T. never owned.
Apex & Crisis / OSAKA · EXPO ’70
The Pepsi Pavilion — the same object was both.
A mirrored dome wrapped in Fujiko Nakaya’s fog sculpture — the apex of E.A.T.’s ambition and the site of its crisis at once. The experimental program collided with Pepsi-Cola’s expectation of a conventional corporate showcase, and the contradiction at the heart of art-and-corporation was exposed under a spherical mirror.
It is the truest emblem of the whole enterprise: a beautiful, unstable machine that only held together while everyone agreed on what it was for.
Mediums & Archetypes / INDEX
The forms it worked in.
Signal Out / IMPACT
Societal impactOUT.01
Pioneered the art-and-technology field, staged its defining early events, and modeled the artist-in-lab collaboration later institutionalized by CAVS, the Media Lab, and creative-technology practice everywhere.
Scenius signatureOUT.02
An organization built to manufacture collisions between artists and engineers — brokering scenius across the art–science divide.
— Fate —
Faded by the late 1970s as a body, but its collaboration model became the template for media labs and the whole creative-technology field.
Sources / PROVENANCE · imported · confidence: high
- “Experiments in Art and Technology (E.A.T.),” official site. experimentsinartandtechnology.org used for: organizational overview, mission, and project history
- “Experiments in Art and Technology,” Wikipedia (accessed 2026). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiments_in_Art_and_Technology used for: founding narrative, 9 Evenings details, key figures, Pepsi Pavilion account
- “Billy Klüver: E.A.T. — Archive of published documents,” Fondation Daniel Langlois. fondation-langlois.org used for: Klüver biography and Tinguely collaboration, Technical Services structure
- “Experiments in Art and Technology records, 1966–1993,” Getty Research Institute. getty.edu/research used for: archival scope, organizational self-documentation, later institutional footprint
Coded from public web sources (Wikipedia-led); not yet independently verified. No photographs accompany this record — the page is rendered image-free, in the visual grammar of the switching circuits, oscilloscope traces, and mimeographed technical reports the movement worked in.
← return to the scenic garden